Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to right sidebar Skip to footer
Choose language:

Month: August 2023

The importance of business regulations for organizations and institutions

The government offers hundreds of programs to help businesses and entrepreneurs, including financial aid, information, and services. Startup financing is made available through direct business regulation. Grants, coaching, training, and management counselling are also available. Small and medium-sized firms can get help from the Commerce Department to expand their foreign product sales.

The rule of law is an often-overlooked service provided by the government to all businesses. The US Patent and Trademark Office protects ideas and specific commodities against unauthorized infringement by competitors, encouraging innovation and creativity. Patent and trademark infringements are penalized by substantial fines and costly legal proceedings if the offender is found guilty.

Furthermore, during bad economic times, the government goes above and beyond to protect enterprises. Some analysts believe that the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and subsequent economic stimulus programs prevented a repeat of the Great Depression. Similarly, the CARES Act, implemented in response to the coronavirus, may have saved several firms from closure in 2020. Some economists feel that the government should not have intervened and that unsuccessful businesses should have been liquidated by market forces rather than government intervention.

Government Regulations and Their Effect on Business

Enterprise regulation has existed in the United States for as long as there have been commercial operations to oversee. Federal regulations and laws can be implemented by legislative acts that control entire industries, or they can be applied to the economic operations of owners on an individual basis. These guidelines are intended to enhance the public’s health, safety, welfare, and morals.

What are the Objectives of the Government’s Business Regulations?

Federal laws and measures implemented to protect firms and the public interest are known as government-direct business regulations. Small businesses can benefit from these limits as they grow. For example, if you own a construction company, government regulations may require you to employ specified safety equipment on the job site.

Federal rules have an impact on how local businesses operate because they define standards for employee safety, health care, and environmental protection. State licensing regulations, for example, may require you to carry some insurance for your employees if they are injured on the job while using dangerous equipment.

Small company rules can improve quality and public safety, which is important for attracting new customers who want to feel comfortable when making purchases from their facility. Finally, by requiring businesses to follow specific standards while doing business with customers, these regulations safeguard consumers from fraud and poor service.

Reduction of Government Control Over the Business Sector

The first antitrust act was established by Congress in 1890, and it was followed by recurring increases in corporation tax rates and more complex business statutes. Historically, the business community has been vocal in its opposition to legislation, rules, and tax levies that it believes will impair its operations and profitability. Overregulation and high taxation, according to one popular argument, cost society money in the long term. Opponents argue that government regulations stifle disruptive innovation and make it difficult to react to social developments.

Others feel that regulation is necessary for compelling reasons. Businesses have harmed the environment, abused people, broken immigration laws, and misled customers in their pursuit of profit.

Proponents argue that this is why elected authorities who must answer to the public are in charge of regulation in the first place. Furthermore, some norms are required for civilised competitive firms to survive. Few legitimate businesses want to be associated with racketeering or the black market. In any event, businesses and laws are now in place to limit ostensibly free market excesses. Many of these limits are being criticized by businesses, who also want other policies amended to benefit them.

  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted by Congress in 2002 in response to widespread corporate misconduct at a number of companies, including Enron, Tyco, and WorldCom. The statute governs accounting, auditing, and corporate accountability. Many business leaders opposed the measure, claiming that it would be difficult, time-consuming, and ineffective to implement. They also predicted that the law would not protect shareholders from fraud.

When various financial scams, including Bernie Madoff, were made public during the 2008 financial crisis, this viewpoint received considerable credence.

  • President Richard Nixon founded the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) via executive order in 1970. The organization monitors other toxins and rubbish disposal, as well as limiting greenhouse gas emissions. Businesses who must comply with these restrictions have expressed discontent, claiming that their expenses and revenues have been jeopardized.
  • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is viewed as a competitor by some firms. It was founded in 1914 to protect customers from dishonest or anti-competitive company practices. Monopolization, pricing manipulation, and deceptive advertising are examples of such practices.
  • Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was formed by Congress in 1934. It regulates initial public offerings (IPOs), ensures that all information is provided, and enforces stock trading regulations.
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Pharmaceutical companies frequently complain that the FDA delays the clearance and sale of some treatments unduly. Even when the drugs have already showed efficacy, more extensive or lengthy clinical trials are typically required. Because it is so expensive to have drugs licensed, small enterprises may be discouraged from entering the market. Furthermore, the FDA has been chastised for delaying the approval and human trials of treatments for those suffering from life-threatening conditions.
  • Controlled Regulation: Possibly the most severe criticism of government rules is the risk of regulatory capture. When this happens, the industries they are supposed to regulate gain control over the authorities tasked with protecting consumers. In order to promote preferred companies, the regulator may intentionally up barriers to entry and redirect public funds for bailouts.

Government Regulation Examples

Government regulations have always been something that businesses must follow. But in recent years, there has been an increasing tendency toward more government regulation of commercial behaviour. This is a result of globalisation, which has increased and led to firms now operating both nationally and globally. Here are the top 5 government regulation examples:

  • Tax Regulations: Taxation is one of the most essential forms of legislation designed to integrate enterprises into the country’s economy. To fully comply with tax legislation, paying the correct taxes at the correct time is required. Furthermore, tax regulations may differ based on the type of firm. National corporations, for example, must pay federal taxes, but the majority of small firms must pay state taxes. Tax evasion or violation may result in jail or other consequences.
  • Employment and Labour Regulations: Regulations for protecting employee rights are included in labour legislation. It allows company owners to set the minimum pay and overtime regulations in accordance with employees’ rights. Some laws stipulate how employers must treat their employees. Institutions must abide by labour rules and provide a secure working environment for their employees.

Examples include social assistance schemes, non-citizen employment permits, equal opportunity procedures, fair union contacts, and other Employment and Labour Law regulations.

  1. The Fair Labour Standards Act (FLSA)
  2. The OSH Act,
  3. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
  4. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
  • Antitrust Regulation: You may have devised ways to corner the market as a business owner. However, while using these tactics, you must ensure that you comply with antitrust rules. Antitrust laws govern the methods and means of communication between business owners. As a result, it ensures that businesses stay within their purview and that unfair competition between businesses does not arise.
  • Advertising: Advertising tactics are critical to your company’s exposure. However, you must adhere to certain restrictions when developing these methods to make your organisation visible and renowned in the market. To begin with, the promises and statements that stick out in your advertisements should eventually represent the truth. When drafting your ad, you must also add your references. Violations of these guidelines may cause your ad to be diverted from its intended purpose and result in fines for your company.

Conclusion

The government may provide financial, legal, and other aid to businesses. It can also be a government employee, enacting and implementing consumer protection, labour safety, and other laws. Regulators have a long history of trapping countries in long-term decline cycles. This issue will almost never be addressed because disagreements between different parts of any community are unavoidable. The government’s relationship with corporations may become more controlled and collaborative as technology progresses. The key to success may be to maintain the government’s neutrality while the rules of the game change.

The role of the Election Commission in ensuring free and fair elections India

The Election Commission of India plays a crucial role in organising elections. The most significant role of the Election Commission of India is to ensure free and fair elections as per the norms and the Model Code of Conduct. It is in charge of monitoring the actions and activities of the political parties and candidates and tries to ensure free, fair and transparent elections in India. The Election Commission is a constitutional body empowered to conduct free and fair elections under Article 324 of the Indian constitution.

Functions of the Election Commission of India:

  1. Election Commission of India superintendents, direct and control the entire process of conducting elections to Parliament and Legislature of every State and to the offices of the President and Vice-President of India.
  2. The most essential function of the commission is to decide the election schedules for the conduct of periodic and timely elections, whether general or bye-elections.
  3. It prepares the electoral rolls and issues Electronic Photo Identity Cards (EPIC).
  4. It decides on the location of polling stations, assignment of voters to the polling stations, location of counting centres, arrangements to be made in and around polling stations and counting centres and all allied matters.
  5. It grants recognition to political parties & allots election symbols to them along with settling disputes related to it.
  6. The Commission also has advisory jurisdiction in the matter of post-election disqualification of sitting members of Parliament and State Legislatures.
  7. It issues the Model Code of Conduct in elections for political parties and candidates so that no one indulges in unfair practice or there is no arbitrary abuse of powers by those in power.
  8. It sets limits on the campaign expenditure per candidate to all the political parties and also monitors the same.

Challenges faced by the Election Commission

  • Suspension of norms of civility – and responsibility owing to the anonymous nature of the engagement on the internet and social media. Free and fair election is important not only for the expression of the will of people but also to maintain social cohesion and democratic values of equality, fraternity etc. Enforcing a Model Code of Conduct in such a scenario becomes extremely difficult. 
  • Use of bots and unfair means to trend on social media – The immediacy of the engagement, with deep penetration through the device of posts going viral, sometimes, allegedly, owing to the deployment of bots, creates a challenge in conducting free and fair elections. 
  • The phenomenon of fake news and misinformation – an important aspect of the role that social media are likely to play in the elections is the phenomenon of fake news and misinformation. The social rupture caused by such campaigns, including heightened insecurity for marginalised sections of society, is phenomenal.
  • De-Institutionalization of the democratic structure – A relatively small financial cost lends the ability to a small number of users to bombard the electorate with party political messages with little political accountability or responsibility. The net impact is in geometric proportion to the number of such platforms deployed. The result is the de-institutionalization of the democratic structure and a strengthening of what Lloyd Rudolph and Susanne Rudolph call a command polity.
  • Othering/marginalization of some sections – This is the space where othering takes place with impunity and with only a minuscule risk of social censure. Absolved of the responsibility to defend their views in an open arena of co-equal citizens, regressive actors are able to campaign for their political viewpoints from the safety of a smartphone.
  • Dilution of public reasoning – the fulcrum of public reasoning is shifting to the construction of the other. It therefore becomes less important for political actors to propose their own programme of action and more important for them to contest characterizations by others.
  • Allegations of hacking of EVMs – When it’s difficult to verify news and counter fake news, allegations like hacking of EVMs may gain traction. This will completely shake the credibility of the EC and erode trust in the election process.   

Efforts made by Election Commission

  • Election Commission of India is empowered to cancel the elections or call for re-elections if any kind corruption or malpractices are found; this is the most powerful tool in the hands of election commission to make democracy possible in letter and spirit.
  • To further improve the transparency in elections, Election Commission of India introduced Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) in 1999.
  • In 2010, Election Commission of India accepted the recommendations of Indiresan committee to introduce Voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) for further transparency.
  • In the same line, the EC is currently considering the use of Totaliser Machines during elections to mask booth-wise voting patterns.
  • Internet major Google and social media giants Twitter and Facebook have assured the Election Commission that they will not allow their platforms to be used for anything which affects the purity of polls during campaign period. It is another laudable effort of Election Commission of India to strengthen democracy.
  • The last 48 hours before the elections come to a close is called ‘silence period’ so that voter can calmly decide on as to whom to vote. Google, Facebook, etc. also assured the EC that political advertisements will be flagged, including the amount spent, so that expenditure can also be accounted for during campaign period.

Similarly, some other efforts taken by Election Commission of India to strengthen the democracy by elections in India are, Model Code of Conduct, awareness campaigns, National Voters Day (25th Jan), Electoral Bonds, etc.

Some of the recent steps taken also include – 

  • Banned prominent politicians from campaigning for a certain period in the recent Lok Sabha election. 
  • Banned a biopic movie. 
  • Banned election campaign in Kolkata due to eruption of violence. 
  • SVEEP – Systematic voter’s education and electoral awareness program. 
  • C-Vigil – to maintain the integrity of the election process. 
  • Setup Media Certification and Monitoring Committee

ECI reform plan: For a level playing field

  1. ECI is considering tightening ways to cap the expenditure of political parties. But even this can be meaningful only if there is more transparency in campaign finance which suggests that the electoral bonds system, as it is in place now, is untenable.
  2. The ECI has suggested bringing social media and print media under the “silent period” ambit after campaign ends. Regulating social media will be difficult and it remains to be seen how the ECI will implement this.
  3. The ECI also plans to introduce new “safe and secure” voting methods.
    • The use now of the EVM as a standalone, one-time programmable chip-based system, along with administrative safeguards renders it a safe mechanism that is not vulnerable to hacking. 
    • Any other “online” form of voting that is based on networked systems should be avoided
  4. Aadhaar-Voter ID linkage to weed out duplications and misrepresentations from the electoral rolls – The idea of an Aadhaar-linked remote voting system that is sought to be built as a prototype could be problematic considering how the unique identity card has excluded genuine beneficiaries when used in welfare schemes
  5. Amendments to Section 20(6) of the Representation of the People’s Act, 1951 to allow the husband of a female officer to be registered as a service voter where she holds office.
  6. Granting powers to ECI to deregister a party
  7. Greater autonomy to ECI

How Election Commission ensure free and fair elections in India?

  1. Election Commission ensure free and fair election by enforcing and maintaining a model code of conduct before elections and punishes any candidate or party that violates it.
  2. The Commission had gone to the extent of disciplining the political parties with a threat of de-recognising if the parties failed in maintaining inner-party democracy.
  3. It upholds the values enshrined in the Constitution viz, equality, equity, impartiality, independence; and rule of law in superintendence, direction, and control over the electoral governance.
  4. It conducts elections with the highest standard of credibility, freeness, fairness, transparency, integrity, accountability, autonomy and professionalism.
  5. It ensures participation of all eligible citizens in the electoral process in an inclusive voter-centric and voter-friendly environment.
  6. It engages with political parties and all stakeholders in the interest of the electoral process.
  7. It creates awareness about the electoral process and electoral governance amongst stakeholders namely, voters, political parties, election functionaries, candidates and people at large; and to enhance and strengthen confidence and trust in the electoral system of this country.
  8. During the times of elections, it can order the government to follow some guidelines towards making the elections free and fair.
  9. At the time of election duty, the government officers work under the control of EC and not the ruling party.
  10. The Commission approaches the government well in advance to obtain the names of senior officers for the purpose of appointment as observers before any election.
  11. Commission via SVEEP, ECI engages more and more voters in the electoral process and ensure their ethical and inducement-free participation in voting.

For the last 15 years, the EC is exercising its powers to full potential and has even increased them. Today the free and fair elections are just because of the working of EC. The internal system of monitoring by neutral and senior government officers has become time tested and been proving to be very useful during elections. Over the years influence of money and criminal elements in politics has increased along with violence and electoral malpractices resulting in criminalisation of politics. The ECI has been able to arrest this but not completely.

Impact of Globalization on Judicial Process and Administration of Justice

Meaning of Globalization The term “Globalization” refers to the increasing interdependence of the economies, cultures, and populations throughout,  the world as a result of technology, cross-border trade in goods and services, and flows of capital, labour, and information. The idea of globalization is not new and has existed for millennia. This process was accelerated by the Industrial Revolution, which made it possible to produce things more quickly and, as a result, expanded international trade. Globalization affects the economy in terms of commodities, services, information, technology, and financial resources. The opening up of international marketplaces has a liberating effect on trade in products and money. The possibility of creating global marketplaces has increased ways to remove trade obstacles. Also Read – Celebrating India’s 15th August:

Impact of Globalization on Judicial Process and Administration of Justice Globalization has an impact on how justice is delivered in various countries. It affects and spreads the legal developments and discussions taking place from one region of the world to another.

The growth of laws and ideas about human rights, competition law, intellectual property rights, cyber laws, media laws, etc. in recent years is the best illustration of this. Globalization has impacted how these laws have developed in many nations around the world. The laws passed in one country have an impact on the laws passed in another country. This is due to the straightforward reality that globalization has connected economies between countries that would not otherwise have any kind of territorial or geographic connection.

The numerous socio-economic aspects of globalization are also continuously changing how our legal systems operate. For instance, certain types of appellate litigation and decision-making require the use of foreign precedents. Due to this, domestic courts are compelled to deal with foreign legal materials in areas like a conflict of laws, where they must make decisions on things like proper jurisdiction, choice of law, and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards. Furthermore, if their respective nations are signatories to the same international instruments (such as treaties, conventions, and declarations), domestic courts must also consider the language and interpretations of those documents.

There is a concurrent trend towards convergence in the domestic constitutional law of various countries due to the ever-expanding scope of international human rights norms and the role of international institutions dealing with diverse issues such as trade liberalization, climate change, war crimes, the law of the sea, and cross-border investment disputes, among others. There is no justification for stifling the judicial exchange between various legal systems that are based on comparable ideals and principles in this era of globalized legal norms. The main driver of trans-judicial communication has been the rise in direct interactions between judges, attorneys, and scholars from various jurisdictions.

Conclusion

The expansion of arms-length regulatory practices and the globalization of external corporate interactions are driving up demand for attorneys and their involvement in an increasing number of social, economic, and political relationships. With increased participation and involvement of nations and increased access to domestic economies, globalization brought about a revolution in international trade. The necessity for transnational law has multiplied in today’s growing interdependence and global trade.

Collegium System in India

Articles 124(2) and 217 of the Indian Constitution deal with appointing judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts.

In India, the President is the nominating authority who chooses judges based on the collegium’s recommendations. The Collegium System is not mentioned in the Indian Constitution or any other legislation. However, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reiterated the country’s judiciary’s independence and political influence in judge nominations. Supporters support the collegium system because it ensures the freedom of the judiciary and the nomination of deserving and unbiased judges in the country. However, detractors believe it is an ineffectual method since the collegium system lacks transparency and accountability and is frequently accused of nepotism and corruption.

Article 124(2) talks about the appointment of Supreme Court Judges and states, “Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Court in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years: Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted……”

Therefore, the power to appoint the Supreme Court Judges (including the Chief Justice of India) vests with the President of India. However, this needs to be done in “consultation” with the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in the case of a Supreme Court judge other than the CJI.

Article 217(1) talks about the appointment of High Court Judges and states, “Every Judge of a High Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, the Governor of the State, and, in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of the High court, and shall hold office, in the case of an additional or acting Judge, as provided in Article 224, and in any other case, until he attains the age of sixty-two years……”

Therefore, the judges to the High Courts are appointed by the President upon “consultation” with the Chief Justice of India and the Governor of the relevant state and the Chief Justice of the High Court also, in case of a judge other than the Chief Justice of the High Court. The word “consultation” has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in various case laws (discussed later) which led to the evolution of the Collegium System in India.

Who Heads the Collegium System?

  • The SC collegium is headed by the CJI (Chief Justice of India) and comprises four other senior-most judges of the court.
  • A High Court collegium is led by the incumbent Chief Justice and two other senior-most judges of that court.
  • Judges of the higher judiciary are appointed only through the collegium system and the government has a role only after names have been decided by the collegium.

The Collegium System in India is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution and it evolved through the judicial interpretations of these constitutional provisions by the Supreme Court in the landmark case laws which are now collectively called “Four Judges Cases”.

First Judges Case

The seven-judge bench determined the matter in the First Judges Case, S.P. Gupta v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 149, and introduced the notion of the collegium system in India. The court analyzed the regulations governing the appointment of judges in this case and made significant observations. The court stated that “the Chief Justice of India, the Chief Justice of the High Court, and such other Judges of the High Courts and of the Supreme Court…. are merely constitutional functionaries having a consultative role, and the power of appointment resides solely and exclusively in the Central Government.” However, such consultation should take place.

The court ruled that the Central government was not required to follow and might overturn the opinions of such constitutional authorities, even if their opinions were similar and unanimous. It further stated that when opinions differ on the nomination of a Judge in a High Court, the opinion of any of the constitutional functionaries cannot take precedence, and it is up to the Central Government to decide whether the appointment should be made or not. In the instance of Supreme Court judge appointment, the view of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) cannot be given precedence because the provisions include consultation rather than “concurrence.” Finally, the court’s verdict this case favored the executive (central government), and the executive remained the authority in India with the right to nominate judges.

However, the court in this case concluded that the then-current procedure of appointing judges was insufficient. The court recommended that a collegium comprised of people who are expected to have knowledge of the people who may be fit for appointment on the Bench and of the qualities required for appointment be formed to advise the President on the appointment of judges, which should be broad-based and involve consultation with people with broader interests.

Second Judges Case

In the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association And Anr. v. Union of India, 1993 Supp (2) SCR 659, the nine-judge bench overruled the judgement in the ‘First Judges Case’. The court also emphasised the independence of the judiciary in this case and even observed that “The requirement of prior “consultation” with the superior Judiciary is a logical consequence of having an “independent Judiciary” as basic feature of the Constitution.”

In the case of Supreme Court judges appointed under Article 124, the CJI’s opinion shall be the collective opinion of the “Chief Justice of India, two senior-most Supreme Court Judges, and the senior Supreme Court Judge who comes from the State.”In the case of High Court judges appointed under Article 217, the process will begin with the CJI’s recommendation, which will include the views of two senior-most Judges of the High Court, two senior-most Judges of the Supreme Court, and the opinion of the senior Judge conversant with the affairs of the concerned High Court.

The Supreme Court ruled that the Chief Justice of India’s opinion shall take precedence in the appointment of judges, and no appointment can be made unless it is in accordance with the Chief Justice of India’s position. In terms of the transfer of justice/judge under Article 222, the court ruled that the motion will be launched by the CJI, and the recommendation will be binding on the Executive.]The ‘Second Judges Case’ was how the collegium system was adopted in India to appoint judges.

Third Judges Case

In the ‘Third Judges Case’ (Special Reference Case  1 of 1998), the Supreme Court expanded the strength of the collegium which now includes the CJI and four senior-most Supreme Court judges in case of a Supreme Court Judge appointment or High Court Justice/Judge transfer and two senior most Supreme Court judges in case of a High Court Judge appointment It also defined the meaning of consultation and held that “the expression “consultation with the Chief Justice of India” in Articles 217(1) and 222(1) of the Constitution of India requires consultation with a plurality of Judges in the formation of the opinion of the Chief Justice of India.”

Fourth Judges Case

The Supreme Court ruled in Advocates on Record Association and Anr. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1, that the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2014, and the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act, 2014 were unconstitutional and void.The NJAC was composed of the Chief Justice of India (as Chairman), two senior most Supreme Court judges, the Law and Justice Minister, and two eminent persons (selected by a committee comprised of the Prime Minister, the Chief Justice of India, and the Leader of the Opposition) who would make recommendations to the President regarding judicial appointments.

What are the Issues Related to the Collegium System?

  • Exclusion of Executive:
  • The full absence of the government from the judicial nomination process resulted in a system in which a few judges appoint the rest in perfect secrecy.
  • Furthermore, they are not answerable to any administrative authority, which may lead to the wrong candidate being chosen while the right candidate is overlooked.
  • Chances of Favouritism and Nepotism:
  • The collegium method does not establish any particular criteria for vetting candidates for the position of CJI, which leaves room for nepotism and favouritism.
  • It leads to Court system transparency, which is extremely detrimental to the country’s management of law and order.
  • Against the Principle of Checks and Balances:
  • The notion of check and balance is breached in this system. In India, three organs act partially independently, yet they keep a check and balance on the overwhelming powers of any organ.
  • However, the collegium system vests enormous authority in the judiciary, leaving little room for balance and raising the potential for abuse.
  • Close-Door Mechanism:
    • Critics have pointed out that this system lacks an established secretariat.It is regarded as a closed-door affair, with no public awareness of how and when a collegium meets, or how its decisions are made.
    • Furthermore, no official minutes of collegium proceedings exist.
    • Unequal Representation:
      • The composition of the higher courts is another source of concern; women are significantly underrepresented in the higher judiciary.

The Legal Aid and Advice (Amendment) Bills of 2015 and 2017 and its implications for the poor

INTRODUCTION

The Legal Aid and Advice (Amendment) Bill is a proposed legislation that seeks to amend the existing Legal Aid and Advice Act of 1972. The bill first introduced in the Indian Parliament in 2015 and was subsequently re-introduced in 2017.

The bill’s major goal is to increase access to legal aid and counsel for marginalized and vulnerable groups in society, such as women, children, senior citizens, and people with disabilities. It aims to accomplish this through broadening the scope of legal aid services and increasing the number of legal aid providers available.

The bill proposes the creation of a National Legal assistance and Services Authority, which will be in charge of developing policies and guidelines for the provision of legal assistance and advice. It also intends to establish State Legal Services Authorities in each state to oversee the implementation of local legal assistance programs.

Other key provisions of the bill include the establishment of legal aid clinics in every district of the country and the provision of legal aid to individuals at pre-trial, trial, and post-trial stages of legal proceedings. The bill also proposes to make legal aid a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution.

Overall, the Legal Aid and Advice (Amendment) Bill, if passed, has the potential to significantly improve access to justice for marginalized communities in India.

RIGHT TO FREE TRAIL AND FREE LEGAL AID AS A FUNDAMENTAL CONCOMITANT

The right to a fair trial and free legal aid are two important fundamental concomitants of the right to access justice.

The right to a fair trial is a fundamental human right that is protected by various international treaties and national constitutions. This includes the right to a fair and impartial tribunal, the right to a public trial, the right to be heard, the right to legal representation, the right to cross-examine witnesses, and the right to appeal.

The provision of free legal aid is a recognized international human rights law norm that is included in various national constitutions, including the Indian Constitution. Article 39A of the Indian Constitution guarantees free legal help to all people, particularly the poor and underprivileged elements of society.

FREE LEGAL AID IN INDIA

In India, free legal aid is a constitutional right guaranteed by Article 39A of the Indian Constitution. It guarantees equitable access to justice for all citizens, particularly the impoverished and disenfranchised. The Legal Services Authorities Act of 1987 establishes a legal framework for the administration of free legal assistance programs.

Every state in India has a State Legal Services Authority that is responsible for providing legal aid to qualified clients under this statute. Legal help is supplied through legal aid clinics, court-based legal aid cells, and other similar organizations. The goal of free legal aid is to ensure that everyone has access to justice, regardless of their financial situation or background.

LAND MARK GENERATING LEGAL AID MOVEMENT IN INDIA.

The case of Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (1979) was a watershed moment in India’s legal aid movement. A public interest litigation was launched in this case on behalf of several undertrial convicts who had been imprisoned for several years without being tried. The Supreme Court of India took up the case and ordered the release of all undertrial convicts who have served more than the maximum sentence for the offenses they were charged with..

This case brought to light the issue of India’s delayed speed of justice delivery, as well as the situation of undertrial detainees, many of whom lack the financial capacity to obtain legal representation. It raised awareness about the need for legal aid programs, which resulted in the establishment of the Legal Services Authorities Act of 1987, which offers free legal aid to the impoverished and disenfranchised parts of society. The case of Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar is widely recognized as a watershed moment in India’s legal aid movement, and it is still cited as a precedent in situations involving access to justice and legal aid.

CONCLUSION

The Legal assistance and counsel (Amendment) Bills of 2015 and 2017 were proposed legislations in India aiming at enhancing access to legal assistance and counsel for disadvantaged and vulnerable groups. The proposals proposed establishing a National Legal Aid and Services Authority as well as State Legal Services Authorities to oversee the provision of legal aid services at the national and state levels.

While the laws were not enacted, there is still a pressing need in India for legal assistance reforms to ensure that every citizen has equitable access to justice. Future legislative efforts are planned to build on the suggestions made in the Legal Aid and Advice (Amendment) Bill and work toward a more equal and just society.

Procedure for Buyback of Shares

Modes of Buyback of Shares of Private/Unlisted Company One of the first points of interest are the various modes through which a company can execute a share buyback:

1. Proportionate Basis: A company can choose to buy back shares from its existing shareholders or security holders on a proportionate basis. This means that the allocation of buyback shares is directly proportional to their current ownership in the company.

2. Open Market: Alternatively, companies can opt to buy back shares from the open market. This method involves purchasing shares from the open stock market, which provides more flexibility and less direct influence over the shareholders involved.

3. Employee Schemes: Another avenue for buyback lies in purchasing securities issued to employees through schemes like stock options or sweat equity. This approach aligns with incentivizing and rewarding the company’s workforce.

Sources for Buyback of Shares of Private/Unlisted Company Equally important is understanding where the funds for share buybacks can be sourced from. Companies have several options, including Free Reserves: Utilizing the accumulated free reserves of the company to fund the buyback process. Securities Premium Account: Tapping into the securities premium account to finance the buyback.

Proceeds from Share or Securities Issuance: Alternatively, companies can use the proceeds generated from the issuance of new shares or securities to facilitate the buyback. However, it’s vital to note that the source of funds for buybacks cannot come from the proceeds of a prior issuance of the same category of shares or securities.

This rule ensures the integrity of the buyback process and prevents any misuse of funds. Essential Conditions for Buyback of Shares of Private/Unlisted Company For a successful and compliant buyback, certain conditions must be met: Authorization by Company’s Articles: The company’s articles of association must specifically authorize share capital buybacks. In cases where the articles lack relevant provisions, they need to be modified in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. Shareholder Approval via Special Resolution:

Except for specific cases, buybacks require shareholder approval through a special resolution passed in a general meeting. However, if the buyback is 10% or less of the company’s total paid-up equity capital and free reserves, board authorization through a board resolution is sufficient. Maximum Limit:

The aggregate value of the shares bought back should not exceed 25% of the paid-up share capital and free reserves of the company. Debt-Equity Ratio Post-Buyback: Following the buyback, the debt-equity ratio of the company must not exceed 2:1. Fully Paid-Up Shares or Securities: Only fully paid-up shares or securities can be bought back.

Completion Period: Every buyback process must be completed within one year from the date of passing the special resolution or board resolution, as the case may be. Minimum Gap Between Buyback Offers: There must be a minimum gap of one year between two successive buyback offers. These conditions ensure that buybacks are conducted with transparency, accountability, and adherence to regulatory norms. Step-by-Step Process for Buyback of Shares of Private/Unlisted Company Let’s navigate through the step-by-step process that private or unlisted companies need to follow for a successful buyback:

1. Article Authorization: Ensure that the company’s articles of association authorize the buyback of share capital. In case of the absence of relevant provisions, modify the articles in line with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

2. Convene a Board Meeting: If the buyback constitutes 10% or less of the company’s total paid-up equity capital and free reserves, the Board of Directors can authorize the proposal through a resolution passed during a board meeting.

3. Convene a General Meeting: For any buyback exceeding the 10% threshold, the proposal must be authorized by a special resolution passed in a duly convened General Meeting.

4. File Form MGT-14 with ROC: Within 30 days of passing the Board Resolution or Special Resolution in the General Meeting, as the case may be, file Form MGT-14 with the Registrar of Companies (ROC). This submission should include requisite documents and fees as specified in the Companies (Registration offices and fees) Rules, 2014.

5. Declaration of Solvency: Prior to the buyback, file a declaration of solvency in Form SH.9 along with the letter of offer in Form SH-8. This declaration should be signed by a minimum of two directors, with one of them being the managing director, if applicable. The declaration should affirm that the Board of Directors has conducted a thorough assessment of the company’s financial affairs and ascertained its capability to meet its liabilities without rendering the company insolvent within a year from the declaration’s adoption.

6. Dispatch the Letter of Offer: Once the necessary filings are made, dispatch the letter of offer to shareholders or security holders. This should occur promptly after filing but not later than 20 days from the filing date with the Registrar of Companies.

7. Offer Period: The offer for the buyback should remain open for a period of not less than 15 days and not exceeding 20 days from the date of dispatch of the letter of offer. However, in cases where all members of the company are in agreement, the offer period may be less than 15 days.

8. Verification of Offer: The company is required to complete the verification of offers received within 15 days from the closure of the offer. If no communication of rejection is conveyed within 21 days from the closure date, the shares or other securities lodged will be deemed accepted.

9. Open a Separate Bank Account: Following the closure of the offer, the company must immediately open a separate bank account. This account will hold the necessary funds to cover the entire sum due and payable as consideration for the shares tendered for buyback, as per the stipulated rules.

10. Extinguishment of Shares/Securities: Within seven days of the last date of completion of the buyback, the company should extinguish and physically destroy the shares or securities that were bought back. This step ensures the removal of such shares or securities from circulation.

11. File Form SH-11: After the completion of the buyback, the company should file a return in Form No. SH.11 within 30 days of the completion date. This filing should be made with the Registrar, accompanied by stipulated fees and specific documents, including a description of the bought-back shares or securities, particulars relating to holders of securities before the buyback, a certified true copy of the special resolution passed at the general meeting, a certified true copy of the board resolution authorizing the buyback, the company’s balance sheet, and a declaration certifying that the buyback was conducted in compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act and the relevant rules.

12. Maintain the Statutory Register: The company is also obligated to maintain a register of shares or other securities that have been bought back. This register, Form No. SH.10, should be housed at the company’s registered office and be in the custody of the Company Secretary or another individual authorized by the board for this purpose.

The entries in this register should be authenticated by the Company Secretary or the authorized individual. Navigating Complex Waters: Share Buybacks and the Companies Act Understanding and adhering to Sections 68, 69, and 70 of the Companies Act, 2013, along with the ramifications of Rule 17 from the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Amendment Rules, 2016, is crucial for private and unlisted companies aiming to conduct successful share buybacks. Compliance not only ensures seamless navigation through the intricate landscape of corporate regulations but also upholds transparency, accountability, and the credibility of the company’s operations.

Process of Issuing Duplicate Share Certificate

Introduction:

Issuing duplicate share certificates is a crucial aspect of corporate governance governed by specific provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and related rules. Understanding the legal framework, analysis of its provisions, and the precise process are vital for companies.

Rule 5 of The Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 deals with Certificates of shares in cases where shares are not held in dematerialised form A company shall not hold the share certificates except; a) In pursuance of a board resolution being passed; b) On surrender of share certificate to the company Every share certificate shall be issued in Form SH-1 which shall be signed by at least two directors or by a director or company secretary wherever applicable Provided One Person Company (OPC) can issue share certificates with the signature of one director or any person authorized by the board on their behalf As per provisions of Section 88 of Companies Act, 2013 a Register of members needs to be maintained in Form MGT-.1

Duplicate share certificates, Applicable Provisions: Under Section 46 of The Companies Act, 2013, and Rules 5 and 6 of The Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014, issuing duplicate share certificates is outlined with precision. Analysis of Provisions of Law

1. Eligibility for Duplicate Certificates: A duplicate certificate can be issued only in following cases: It is proved that the certificate is lost or destroyed It has been defaced, surrendered to the company

2. Conditions for Issue: A certificate cannot be issued in exchange for consolidated, torn, or where the transfers on the back of the certificate are duly utilised instead it has to be issued only in case where the original certificate has been surrendered to the company Provided that the company may charge such fee as the Board thinks fit, not exceeding fifty rupees per certificate issued on splitting or consolidation of share certificate(s) or in replacement of share certificate(s)

3. Issuance Statement: Duplicate certificate issued shall state on the face – “Issued in lieu of share certificate No….. sub-divided/replaced/on consolidation” and also that no fee shall be payable pursuant to scheme of arrangement sanctioned by the High Court or Central Government: 4. The company can issue share certificates in exchange upon sub-division or consolidation of shares or merger or demerger or any reconstitution without requiring old certificates to be surrendered subject to compliance with Rule 5 of The Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014

5. Time Limit to issue duplicate share certificate: In case of Unlisted companies, it shall be issued within three months from the date of submission of complete documents; In case of listed companies, it shall be issued within Forty-Five days from the date of submission of complete documents.

6. Maintaining Records: Maintain a register or renewed and duplicate share certificates in Form SH-2 which shall be authenticated and kept in the custody of the Company secretary or any authorized person at the registered office of the company.

7. Penal provisions- If the company intends to defraud, the company shall be punishable with a fine of not less than five times the face value of duplicate shares and which may extend to ten times the face value or ten crores whichever is higher Officer in default – Liable under section 447 of Companies Act, 2013.

The process to issue duplicate share certificate

1. Approval from the Board: Commencing with a board meeting, a crucial resolution is passed to authorize the issuance of duplicate share certificates.

2. Document Submission: Companies receive various documents including indemnity bonds, certified true copies of the resolutions passed at a duly convened Board meeting, affidavits, and the application for duplicate share certificates.

3. Verification and Issuance: Following thorough document verification, the company proceeds to issue duplicate share certificates in adherence to prescribed timelines and protocols.

4. The share certificates shall state- “Issued in lieu of Share Certificate No…”

5. Record Update: Ensuring compliance with the requirements of Rule 6, companies maintain a comprehensive register of renewed and duplicate share certificates in Form SH-2.

Conclusion:

The issue of duplicate share certificates is a complex legal process with strict time constraints. Companies must ensure that the Companies Act of 2013 and any applicable rules are followed. Transparency, accountability, and good corporate governance are therefore ensured. Companies can protect themselves from fraudulent acts and maintain the integrity of their shareholding structure by following the steps mentioned.

Auditor Appointment Rules and Guidelines

Introduction:

The process of appointing auditors in accordance with the Companies Act, 2013 involves a structured set of rules and regulations. Understanding the provisions outlined in Section 139, as well as the associated rules and guidelines, is crucial for companies to ensure a smooth and compliant auditor appointment process.

An auditor appointment covers aspects such as the term of appointment, eligibility, procedures, and more. Appointment of Auditor Under section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Companies (Audit & Auditors) Rules, 2014. Section 139 (1)– Every Company shall at the 1st AGM, appoint an individual or firm as an auditor who shall hold the office from the conclusion of that meeting till the conclusion of its 6th AGM and thereafter till the conclusion of every 6th AGM. As per Rule 4 of the Companies (Audit & Auditors) Rules, 2014, Before the appointment is made, the written consent of such appointment and certificate shall be obtained from the auditor. The Auditor shall submit a Certificate that-

a. He is not disqualified for appointment under the Companies Act, 2013 and Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the rules or regulations made thereunder.

b. The proposed appointment is as per the term provided under the Act;

c. The proposed appointment is within the limits laid down by or under the authority of the Act;

d. The list of proceedings against the auditor or audit firm or any partner of the audit firm is pending, if any, as disclosed in the certificate.

The Notice to the registrar about the appointment of an auditor shall be in Form ADT-1 within 15 days from the date of appointment. Section 139(2) read with rule 5 of the Companies (Audit & Auditors) Rules, 2014- The following classes of Companies excluding OPC and Small Companies shall not appoint or reappoint- Listed Company or Unlisted Public Company having a PSC of Rs. 10 Crore or more; Private Limited Company having a PSC of Rs. 50 Crore or more; All Companies having public borrowings from financial institutions, banks or public deposits of Rs. 50 crore or more;

(a) An individual as auditor for more than 1 term of 5 consecutive years, and

(b) an audit firm as auditor for more than 2 terms of 5 consecutive years. Provided that – an individual auditor or an audit firm has completed the term under clauses (a) and (b) shall not be eligible for re-appointment as auditor in the same company for five years from the completion of such term.

On the date of appointment no audit firm having a common partner or partners to the other audit firm, whose tenure has expired in a Company immediately preceding the financial year, shall be appointed as auditor of the same Company for a period of five years. Section 139(3)- The audit shall be conducted by more than 1 auditor. Section 139(5)- In the case of a Govt. Company or any other Company owned or controlled directly or indirectly, by the Central Govt. or State Govt. or partly by the Central Govt. or partly by the 1 or more State Govt., the Comptroller and Auditor-General (C&AG) of India shall, in respect of financial year, appoint an auditor within a period of 180 days from the commencement of the financial year, who shall hold the office till the conclusion the AGM. [The 1st Auditor shall be appointed by the C&AG of India within 60 days from the date of registration of the Company and in case of failure of C&AG, the BOD of the Company shall appoint such auditor within the next 30 days and in case of failure of the Board, it shall inform the members of the Company who shall appoint such auditor within 60 days at an EGM, who shall hold the office till the conclusion 1st AGM].

Section 139(6)- The First Auditor of Company other than Govt. Company shall be appointed by the BOD within 30 days from the date of registration of Company and in case of failure of Board to appoint such auditor, it shall inform the members of the company who shall within 90 days at an EGM appoint such auditor and such auditor shall hold the office till the conclusion of 1st AGM. Any Casual Vacancy in the office of an Auditor shall-

a. In the case of Companies other than Govt. Company, be filled by the BOD within 30 days but if such casual vacancy is as a result of the resignation of an auditor, such appointment shall be approved by the company at a general meeting convened within 3 months of recommendation of the Board and hold the office till the conclusion next AGM.

b. In case of Company is filled by the C&AG of India within 30 days and in case of failure of C&AG of India, the BOD shall fill the vacancy within the next 30 days. A retiring auditor may be reappointed at an AGM if- a. He is not disqualified for the appointment. b. He has not given a notice in writing of his unwillingness to be reappointed

c. Special resolution has not been passed at that meeting appointing some other auditor or providing expressly that he shall not be reappointed. Where at any AGM, no auditor is appointed or re-appointed, the existing auditor shall continue to be the auditor of the company.

Rule 3 of Companies (Audit & Auditors) Rules, 2014, deals with the Manner and Procedure of Selection and Appointment of Auditors.

1. In case of a company that is required to constitute an Audit Committee under section 177, the committee, and, in cases where such a committee is not required to be constituted, the Board, shall take into consideration the qualifications and experience of the individual or the firm proposed to be considered for appointment as an auditor and whether such qualifications and experience are commensurate with the size and requirements of the company.

2. The Audit Committee or the Board, as the case may be, may call for such other information from the proposed auditor as it may deem fit.

3. Where a company is required to constitute the Audit Committee, the committee shall recommend the name of an individual or a firm as auditor to the Board for consideration and in other cases, the Board shall consider and recommend an individual or a firm as auditor to the members in the annual general meeting for appointment.

4. If the Board agrees with the recommendation of the Audit Committee, it shall further recommend the appointment of an individual or a firm as auditor to the members in the annual general meeting.

5. If the Board disagrees with the recommendation of the Audit Committee, it shall refer back the recommendation to the committee for reconsideration citing reasons for such disagreement.

6. If the Audit Committee, after considering the reasons given by the Board, decides not to reconsider its original recommendation, the Board shall record reasons for its disagreement with the committee and send its own recommendation for consideration by the members in the annual general meeting; and if the Board agrees with the recommendations of the Audit Committee, it shall place the matter for consideration by members in the annual general meeting.

7. The auditor appointed in the annual general meeting shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting till the conclusion of the sixth annual general meeting, with the meeting wherein such appointment has been made being counted as the first meeting. The word “firm” shall include a limited liability partnership incorporated under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008.

Conclusion:

The Companies Act, of 2013, which governs the auditor appointment procedure, is intended to ensure openness, responsibility, and conformity to legal requirements. Companies can confidently hire auditors who fulfil the necessary credentials and who can play a significant role in protecting the financial integrity of the organization by adhering to the processes outlined in Section 139 and the related laws. Maintaining compliance while navigating the auditor appointment process smoothly requires keeping current with the rules and processes stated in the Act.

The Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill 2023

Clause 4(3) of the Cinematograph Bill reads thus:

“Any person desiring to exhibit on television or such other media as may be prescribed, any film which has been sanctioned by the Board under clause (ii) or clause (iii) of sub-section (2), may make an application to the Board in such form and manner as may be prescribed, and the Board may, for this purpose, sanction the film with a separate certificate, after directing the applicant to carry out such excisions or modifications in the film as it may think fit.”

There are a couple of interesting things right off the bat. The Cinematograph Act, of 1952 has never governed television programmes and serials and does not in any form mandate that a Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) certification is a pre-requisite for exhibiting content. The mandate for any programme (including films) exhibited on cable television to be required to be certified by the CBFC came from the Programme Code under the Cable Television Network Rules, 1994 (CTN Rules). Now, while the CTN Rules were only concerned with ‘cable television networks’, the Cinematograph Bill neither creates any such distinction nor defines ‘television’. Interestingly, Clause 4(3) is only concerned with ‘films’ (which are defined as cinematograph films under the Cinematograph Act) and arguably doesn’t extend to programmes, serials, etc.

Further, unlike Clause 4(1) of the Bill, which mandates CBFC certification for the exhibition of a film, this provision uses the word ‘may’ to suggest that it is in fact not mandatory to obtain certification for films planned to be exhibited on television (which arguably means that barring ‘cable television network’, for all other television forms, there is no obligation to obtain a certificate).

‘Reeling’ in OTTs through the backdoor, again

Along with ‘television’, the government has also left it open to itself to also prescribe any other media which would be subject to this provision. This, arguably and quite possibly, refers to the exhibition of films on OTT platforms. While we are yet to receive any clarity on this and there is no notification including ‘publishers of online curated content’ within this provision, the broad and open-ended language of this provision empowers the government to include any form of media within the fold of this clause.

Two years ago, the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (MEITY) came up with the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (Digital Media Code) under Section 87(2)(zg) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) and extended its application to ‘publishers of online curated content’. Similarly, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) has potentially extended the application of the Cinematograph Act to OTT platforms. The reason for this comparison is that similar to the MEITY not having power under the IT Act to create laws with respect to OTT platforms, so too the MIB does not have the power to extend the requirement for certification to OTT platforms under the Cinematograph Act.

The Cinematograph Bill muddies the waters slightly, because, on the one hand, it authorizes the government to extend its application to OTT platforms, and on the other hand, there is nothing in the Cinematograph Act (even after this Bill) or in the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983 that provides any basis to enable the extension of the Act to OTT platforms.

This is interesting to say the least, considering the judgment of the Division Bench of Karnataka High Court in Padmanabh Shankar Vs. Union of India & Ors. The Karnataka High Court, having regard to the definitions of ‘film’ and ‘cinematograph’ under the Act (definitions have NOT been changed by the Bill), had held that the Cinematograph Act does not extend or apply to films, serials, etc transmitted or exhibited through the internet.

Fin

Whether the Cinematograph Act will be extended to OTT platforms and if so, how will it play out both legally and practically, remains to be seen. However, with the Government breathing heavily down the necks of OTT players with the Digital Media Code in 2021 (which is currently under challenge), the COTPA Amendment Rules 2023, the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill 2023 and the various Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) consultation papers on OTT services, the OTT players aren’t exactly being left a lot of wiggle room or breathing space legally and practically. While it is way too early to predict with some degree of certainty how these developments will impact OTT platforms as well as consumers in the long run, what is clear is that comprehensively regulating the digital sector is on the government’s agenda and it is slowly but surely taking steps towards it.

Guidelines For Appointing “Support Persons” For Victims Under The POCSO Act Are Issued By The Supreme Court

Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India WP C. No. 427/2022

The Supreme Court on Friday(Aug 18), passed an order relating to the appointment of support persons under the POCSO Act and their qualifications. The Court issued directions for framing guidelines on their appointment. It is pertinent to note that POCSO Rules, 2020 define a ‘support person as “someone assigned by a child welfare committee to render assistance to a child during the process of investigation and trial, or any other person assisting a child pre-trial or during the process of a trial pertaining to the offences under the POCSO Act, 2012.”

Key Directives by the Supreme Court include-

1. Reporting Mechanism Establishment: The Authorities are mandated to establish a robust and effective reporting mechanism.

2. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP): The Court emphasized the creation of a meticulous SOP to guide the reporting process. This SOP should be shared with Juvenile Justice Boards and Child Welfare Committees to ensure uniformity in response.

3. Role of Support Persons: The court recognized the challenging nature of victim interactions, especially in hostile environments.

4. Remuneration of Support persons to be commensurate with Qualification and Experience: While the rules stipulate payment for support persons akin to skilled workers, the Supreme Court has highlighted the need for remuneration to be aligned with qualifications and experience.

5. Model Guidelines and Precedent Consideration: “For framing of guidelines, Model guidelines prepared prior to POCSO rules may be considered,” the court said.

6. Comprehensive Victim Support: The Supreme Court observed that justice transcends apprehending the culprits; it is equally important to ensure victims receive proper care, support, and security throughout the entire legal process.

7. Role of Support Institutions: Stressing the vital role of support institutions, the court emphasized that true justice is achieved when victims are reintegrated into society with their dignity and worth restored.

8. State’s Responsibility for Implementation: After the establishment of POCSO Rules, 2020, it falls to the state to be the main stakeholder in ensuring the strict implementation of these directives.