Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to right sidebar Skip to footer

Law of Insurance

Indian Railway Act 1989

Transportation is a major part of the Indian economy. Indian Railways started its service on 16 April 1853. The first train was run over a stretch of 33 kilometres from Mumbai to Thane.

The first railway proposals for India were made in Madras in 1832. The country got its first train in the form of Red Hill Railway which was built with the sole purpose of transporting granite for road building.In 1845, the Godavari Dam Construction Railway was built by Cotton at Dowleswaram in Rajahmundry, to supply stone for the construction of a dam over the Godavari River. In 1851, the Solani Aqueduct Railway was built by Proby Cautley in Roorkee to transport construction materials for an aqueduct over the Solani River

Objectives of Railway Act

The Railway Act 1989 establishes the railway administration’s substantive obligation for loss, destruction, damage, non-delivery, or degradation of goods entrusted to them for carriage, as well as death, injury, or loss to a passenger in a railway accident or adverse occurrence.

Consignors/consignees and passengers or their representatives pursue compensation claims for damages and losses to booked goods and, if unsatisfied with the railway administration’s decisions, seek legal redress in court.

Claims for compensation for the death, injury, or loss of a passenger in a train accident are currently decided by claims commissioners. Due to the lengthy nature of litigation in courts of law and before claims commissioners, it’s decided to establish a specialized Tribunal for the expeditious adjudication of such claims.

The establishment of such a Claims Tribunal, with Benches in various regions of the country and judicial and technical members, will bring significant relief to train users by expediting payment of compensation to victims of rail accidents and those whose products are lost or damaged in rail transit.

The following are the further objectives of the Railway Act:

  • Maintain an unyielding struggle against criminals to protect railway passengers, the passenger area, and railway property.
  • Remove any anti-social elements from trains, railway premises, and passenger places to improve passenger travel and security.
  • Maintain vigilance to avoid human trafficking of women and children, and take necessary action to rehabilitate poor children located in railway areas.
  • Cooperate with other Indian Railways departments to improve the Indian Railways’ efficiency and image.
  • Serve as a link between the Railway administration and the Government Railway Police/local police.
  • In pursuit of these goals, use all modern technology, best human rights practices, management strategies, and specific steps to protect female, elderly, and children passengers.

Features of Railway Act

The Indian Railway act provides the following legislative provisions for:

Railway Zones

The Indian Railway System currently gets organised into 18 zones, including two deemed zones (i.e. Kolkata metro and Konkan railway), each led by a General Manager who is accountable to the Railway Board for the railway’s operation, maintenance and financial status.

Construction and maintenance of works

According to the railway act, a railway administration has the authority to make, construct, and perform any other actions necessary for the construction, maintenance, alteration, or repair of the railway and use it.

Employee and Passenger Services

According to the act, the Central Government may fix rates for the carriage of passengers and goods for the whole or any part of the railway from time to time by general or special order. Different rates may get fixed for different goods classes and specify in such order the conditions subject to which such rates shall apply.

Rules and regulations under Railway Act

According to section 131 of the Railway Act, the railway rule in chapter XIV will not apply to any of the railway servants to whom the Factories act of 1948, the Mines Act of 1952, the railway protection force act (1957), the merchant shipping act of 1958 applies.

Limitations of hours of work

A railway servant whose work is intermittent may not work more than seventy-five hours in any week. A continuous railway servant may not work for more than fifty-four hours per week on average throughout two weeks of fourteen days. An intensively engaged railway servant may not work more than forty-five hours per week on average throughout two weeks of fourteen days.

Grant of periodical rest

A railway servant whose employment is demanding or prolonged shall be given rest of not less than thirty hours straight for each week beginning on a Sunday. A railway servant whose employment is intermittent shall be given rest of not less than twenty-four hours, along with a whole night, for each week beginning on a Sunday.

Railway servant to remain on duty.

Where proper provisions for a railway servant’s relief got established, the act’s rules authorise him to leave his duties until he is relieved.

Supervisors of Railway Labor

The Central Government has the authority to select railway labour supervisors. Supervisors of railway labour are responsible for inspecting railways to see whether the provisions of this Chapter or the rules promulgated thereunder are being followed and performing any other responsibilities that may get specified.

Provisions of the Railway Act

According to the legislation, any accident involving the loss of human life, grievous bodily harm as defined by the Indian Penal Code, or severe property damage as may be prescribed;

  • any collision involving trains, one of which is a passenger train;
  • a train carrying passengers, or any component of a train carrying passengers, derailing;
  • any accident that is generally accompanied by the loss of human life or such grave harm as stated, or with severe property damage;
  • The railway administration whose territory the incident happens and the railway administration whose train is associated with the accident must notify the State Government and the Commissioner with authority over the accident site as soon as possible.

Section 143 of the Railway Act

Section 143 of the Railways act states that the unauthorised procurement and supplying of railway tickets can result in a penalty.

If any person, who is not a railway servant or an agent duly authorised in this capacity,

  • engages in procuring and supplying railway tickets or reserved accommodation for a train journey.
  • acquires or sells, or seeks to purchase or sell, tickets with the intent of carrying on a business of any kind, whether for himself or someone else;

shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of up to three years or a penalty of up to rupees ten thousand, or both, and shall forfeit the tickets that he procures, purchases supplies, sells or attempts to purchase or sell.

Whether or not the offence gets committed, anyone who aids and abets any crime punishable under this section faces the same punishment as the offender.

Proposed amendments to Railways act, 1989

The Ministry of Railways recently recommended decriminalising begging on trains or railway premises and compounding the offence of smoking by imposing a spot fee and dismissing all charges/actions against the person involved. These amendments are part of a larger effort to decriminalise and rationalise penalties under the Railway Act of 1989.

  • On Begging
    • Current Provision: According to Section 144 (2) of the Act, anyone who begs in a railway carriage or at a railway station faces a penalty of either one year in prison or a fine of up to Rs. 2,000, or both.
    • Proposed Amendment: “No individual shall be permitted to beg in any railway carriage or upon any section of the Railway,” according to the proposed amendment.
      In 2018, the Delhi High Court struck down a similar rule that made begging in the national capital a criminal offence, ruling that the law did not distinguish between voluntary and involuntary begging.
      The statute breached articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The Supreme court concluded that the government could not fail to provide a decent life for its citizens and then add insult to injury by arresting, detaining, and, if necessary, imprisoning those who beg for necessities. After conducting an empirical analysis of the sociological and economic sides of the situation, city governments can introduce alternative legislation to stop any racket of forced begging.
  • On Smoking:
    • Current Provision: According to Section 167 of the Act, no individual shall smoke in any train cabin if another passenger objects. Regardless of any objections, the railway administration has the authority to prohibit smoking in any train or section of a train. Whoever violates these provisions is subject to a punishment of up to Rs.100.
    • Proposed Amendment: If the individual who must pay the fine is willing to pay it right away, the authorised officer may compound the offence by charging the maximum amount to the railway administration. The perpetrator will be released, and no further action will be taken against him or her in connection with the offence.

Offences under Railway Act

The offences under the railway act are as follows:

Smoking

Smoking is prohibited in any cabin of a train if any other passenger in that compartment objects. A railway administration may ban smoking in any train or part of a train, notwithstanding anything in other subsections. Whoever violates the terms of other sub-sections is subject to a fine.

Risking safety

Any person committing an offence under this Act or any rule established thereunder shall get tried for that crime in any place where he is or where the State Government may inform him in this regard, and in any other place liable to be tried under any law currently in force.

If a railway employee, while on duty, puts another person’s safety in jeopardy-

  • by breaking any rule established under this Act
  • by disregarding any instruction, direction, or order issued under this Act or its provisions
  • He shall get punished for any reckless or negligent conduct or omission by imprisonment for a period of up to two years, or a fine of up to 1000 rs, or both.

Obstructions

If any railway servant or other person obstructs, causes to be obstructed, or attempts to obstruct any train or other rolling stock on a railway-

  • squatting, picketing, or participating in any Rail roko movement or bandh
  • by retaining any rolling stock on the railway without authorisation
  • tampering with, detaching from, or otherwise interfering with its hose pipe, tampering with signal gear, or otherwise

He may get sentenced to a period of imprisonment of up to two years, a fine of up to two thousand rupees, or both.

Travelling on roofs, steps or the engine of the trains

A passenger or other person who continues to travel on the roof, step, or footboard of any carriage or engine or in any other component of a train not designated for passenger use will get punished under Section 156 of this act.

He may get imprisoned for up to three months or fined up to five hundred rupees, or both, and may be removed off the railway by any railway servant.

Travelling without tickets or pass

If, to defraud a railway administration,-

  • enters or remains in a railway carriage or travels in a train in violation of section 55,
  • uses or seeks to use a single pass or single ticket already been used on a prior journey, or, in the case of a return ticket, a portion thereof that has previously been used.

He shall get punished by imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding one thousand rupees, or by both: provided, however, that in the absence of unique and sufficient grounds to the contrary specified in the court’s judgement, such punishment shall not be less than a fine of five hundred rupees.

Entering Reserved compartments

  • If a person enters a compartment where the railway administration has not assigned him a berth or seat,
  • Suppose a passenger refuses to leave an unapproved berth or seat booked by the railway administration to use other passengers. In that case, a railway employee may evict him or force him to be removed from the compartment, berth, or seat, as the case may be, and fine him up to 500 rupees.
  • A passenger who refuses to allow another passenger to enter a compartment not designated for the resisting passenger will get fined up to two hundred rupees.

Conclusion

Since British dominance in India, railways have been an essential mode of transportation. The Ministry of Railways operates Indian Railways, which ranks fourth among the world’s largest railway networks. As one of the world’s major railway networks, it is evident that it employs many people.

All land acquisition and related aspects are given considerable importance under the Railway Act of 1989. Proper sections get prescribed that contribute to the smooth operation of the railways while also considering people displaced due to land acquisition railway development.

The Railways Act 1989 is a piece of legislation enacted by the Indian Parliament that addresses all areas of railway transportation. It comprises provisions about railway development, railway zones, railway agencies, the right to purchase land, etc. The Ministry of Railways and Rural Development’s preamble states that while land acquisition for railways and other infrastructural and developmental projects is required and in the national interest, it is also critical to ensure the rights of people living in the area acquired for such projects are not harmed. Under the Indian Railways Act 1989, sufficient legislation has been enacted to ensure that the appropriate compensation gets granted to the aggrieved people and their rights are not restricted

Some Interesting Facts about Indian Railways

  • The Fairy Queen is the oldest functioning steam engine in the world. It is plying between New Delhi and Alwar in Rajasthan.
  • Four sites of Indian Railways have been declared as “World Heritage sites” by the UNESCO. They are Darjeeling-Himalayan Railway, Nilgiri Mountain, Mumbai CST, and Kalka-Shimla Railways.
  • Indian Railways was nationalized in 1951
  • Toilets were introduced on Indian Railways in 1909.
  • Indian Railways started computerized reservation in New Delhi in 1986.
  • Indian Railways is the world’s second-largest network operated under a single administration and the largest rail network in Asia.
  • The railway runs more than 7,421 cargo trains carrying 3 million tons of freight daily.

Motor Insurance

In Motor Insurance, the First party is the owner of property(Motor Vehicle), Second party is the Insurer and the Third party is everyone else, say a person on the street. Normally insurance loss or damage to the property of insured is covered. If your car gets damaged, its repair and replacement is covered.

This is commonly called First party insurance or own damage section of Insurance policy. Third-party insurance is compulsory for all vehicle-owners as per the Motor Vehicles Act. It covers only your legal liability for the damage you may cause to a third party – bodily injury, death and damage to third party property – while using your vehicle in public spaces. Recently, pursuant to the Supreme Court decision, IRDAI has mandated all General Insurance Companies , to make it compulsory to provide long term third-party motor covers for new vehicles to curb the number of uninsured vehicles plying on the road. The top court, in a July 20, 2018 order, said that in the case of new vehicles third party insurance i,e, cars should at least be covered for three years and two-wheelers for five years, either as a separate insurance policy or as part of the comprehensive cover. The order will be effective from September 1,2018. The court also asked the regulator to work with the police and online channels to push sale and renewal of the third party accident cover.

The decision came after a Supreme Court-appointed committee on road safety found that only one in every three vehicles–among 18 crore playing on Indian roads–is insured. This leads to accident victims or their kin not getting any compensation. On the same lines, IRDAI has now recently mandated Insurance Companies to enhance the Compulsory Accident Cover from the existing ` 1,00,000 to at least not less than ` 15,00,000/- for owner of the vehicle with the purpose of adding solace to the victims of road accidents, who are the owners of the vehicles.

Motor insurance policy is a contract between the insured and the insurer in which the insurer promises to indemnify the financial liability in event of loss to the insured. This loss to insured can arise out of:- 

i. Loss to insured motor vehicles due to accidental damage arising out of various perils covered under the policy.

ii. His incurring financial liability towards third parties due to accident of motor vehicle resulting in injury/ disability or death of the third party or damage or loss of third party property 

iii. Personal Accident Injury to owner arising out of insured vehicle meeting with an accident

Whereas Section I – Own damage to vehicle is voluntary section which one may insure or not, the Section II- Third Party Liability and Section -III Personal Accident injury to owner Driver are compulsory cover as per Motor Vehicle Act 1988. Motor third-party insurance or third-party liability cover, which is sometimes also referred to as the ‘act only’ cover, is a statutory requirement under the Motor Vehicles Act. It is referred to as a ‘third-party’ cover since the beneficiary of the policy is someone other than the two parties involved in the contract i.e. the insured and the insurance company. The policy does not provide any benefit to the insured; however it covers the insured’s legal liability for death/disability of a third party or damage to third party property. 

What is Third Party Insurance? 

There are two quite different kinds of insurance involved in the damages system. One is Third Party liability insurance, which is just called liability insurance by insurance companies and the other one is first party insurance. A third party insurance policy is a policy under which the insurance company agrees to indemnify the insured person, if he is sued or held legally liable for injuries or damage done to a third party. The insured is one party, the insurance company is the second party, and the person you (the insured) injure who claims damages against you is the third party.

Section 145(g) “third party” includes the Government. National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Fakir Chand, “third party” should include everyone (other than the contracting parties to the insurance policy), be it a person traveling in another vehicle, one walking on the road or a passenger in the vehicle itself which is the subject matter of insurance policy. According to Section 24 of Motor Vehicles Act, “No person shall use or allow any other person to use a motor vehicle in a public place, unless the vehicle is covered by a policy of Insurance.” Here the term insurance is to be referred as “Third Party Insurance.”

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF MOTOR INSURANCE 

Motor insurance being a contract like any other contract has to fulfill the requirements of a valid contract as laid down in the Indian Contract Act 1872. in addition it has certain special features common to other insurance contracts.

They are: • Utmost good faith • Insurable interest • Indemnity • Subrogation and contribution •

 Utmost good faith

The principle of Utmost good faith casts an obligation on the insured to disclose all the material facts. These material facts must be disclosed to the insurer at the time of entering into the contract. All the information given in the proposal form should be true and complete. E.g. the driving history, physical health of the driver, type of vehicle etc. If any of the mentioned material facts declared by the insured in the proposal form are found inappropriate by the insurer at the time of claim it may result in the claim being repudiated.

Insurable Interest

Insurable Interest In a valid insurance contract it is necessary on the part of the insured to have an insurable interest in the subject matter of insurance. The presence of insurable interest in the subject matter of insurance gives the person the right to insure. The interest should be pecuniary and must be present at inception and throughout the term of the policy. Thus the insured must be either benefited by the safety of the property or must suffer a loss on account of damage to it.

Indemnity Insurance contracts are contracts of indemnity.

Indemnity means making good of the loss by reimbursing the exact monetary loss. It aims at keeping the insured in the same position he was before the loss occurred and thus prevent him from making profit from insurance policy.

Subrogation and Contribution

Subrogation refers to transfer of insured’s right of action against a third party who caused the loss to the insurer. Thus, the insurer who pays the loss can take up the assureds’ place and sue the party that caused the loss in order to minimize his loss for which he has already indemnified the insured. Subrogation comes into the picture only in case of damage or loss due to a third party. The insurer derives this right only after the payment of damages to the insured.

Contribution ensures that the indemnity provided is proportionately borne by other insurers in case of double insurance. Another such instance is the Insurer paying claims in case of “Lost Vehicle” and subsequently the vehicle is recovered. In such cases, due to subrogation rights, the Insurer becomes the owner of such a vehicle and steps in the shoes of the Insured.

CLAIM PROCEDURE FOR MOTOR INSURANCE 

(a) Vehicle Accident Claims After the insured submit his claim form and the relevant documents, the insurer appoints a surveyor to inspect the vehicle and submit his/her report to the insurance company. Insured also get the details of the surveyor’s report. In case of major damage to the vehicle, the insurer arranges for a spot survey at the site of accident. The insured can undertake repairs only on completion of the survey. 

Once the vehicle is repaired, the insured should submit duly signed bills/cash memos to the insurance company. In some cases, companies have the surveyor re-inspect the vehicle after repairs. In such a scenario, the insured should pay the workshop/garage and obtain a proof of release document (this is an authenticated document signed by the owner to release the vehicle from the garage after it is checked and repaired). Once the vehicle has been released, the insured should submit the original bill, proof of release, and cash receipt from the garage to the surveyor. The surveyor sends the claim file to the insurance company for settlement along with all the documents and finally, the insurance company reimburses the insured. In case of an accident, the insurance company pays for the replacement of the damaged parts and the labor fees. The costs that the insured has to bear include: 

A. The amount of depreciation as per the rate prescribed 

B. Reasonable value of salvage (to be discussed separately) 

C. Voluntary deductions under the policy, if the insured have opted for any 

D. Compulsory excesses levied by the insurer In the insured uses the cashless repair facility, the claim money is paid directly to the workshop or garage. Otherwise, the amount of claim is paid to the insured.

(b) Third Party Insurance Claim In the event of a third party claim, the insured should notify the insurance company in writing along with a copy of the notice and the insurance certificate.

The insured should not offer to make an out-of-court settlement or promise payment to any party without the written consent of the insurance company. The insurance company has a right to refuse liabilities arising out of such promises.

The insurance company will issue a claim form that has to be filled and submitted along with:

(a) Copy of the Registration Certificate 

(b) Driving license 

(c) First information report (FIR) After verification, the insurance company will appoint a lawyer in the defense of the insurer and the insured should cooperate with the insurance company, providing evidence during court proceedings. If the court orders compensation, the insurance company will then do it directly.

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Lok Adalats MACT and Lok Adalats are playing an important role in Third party liability claims and almost 90% of third party motor accident claims are being settled through MACT courts or through Lok Adalats organized for settlement of these claims. These platforms provide for a good opportunity for negotiated settlement of the third party claims and timely help to accident victims without waiting for years together to get compensation from the insurance companies. 

(c) Vehicle Theft Claims In the event of theft of vehicle, the insured should lodge the First Information Report (FIR) with a police station immediately, inform the insurance company and provide them with a copy of the FIR. He should also submit the Final Police Report to the insurance company as soon as it is received and extend full cooperation to the surveyor or investigator appointed by the company. After the claim is approved, the Registration Certificate of the stolen vehicle has to be transferred in the name of the company and the insured needs to submit the duplicate keys of the vehicle along with a letter of subrogation and an indemnity on stamp paper (duly notarized) to the insurance company.

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is an Act of the Parliament of India which regulates all aspects of road transport vehicles. The Act came into force from 1 July 1989. It replaced the Motor Vehicles Act, 1938 which earlier replaced the first such enactment Motor Vehicles Act, 1914.

The Act provides in detail the legislative provisions regarding licensing of drivers and conductors, registration of motor vehicles, control of motor vehicles through permits, special provisions relating to state transport undertakings, traffic regulations, insurance, liability, offences and penalties etc. Further, in order to exercise the legislative provisions of the Act, the Government of India made the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. On 22 May 2018, the Central Government issued a notification by which the scale of compensation for third party fatal accidents and injury claims under the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (MV Act) was amended.

These claims for compensation are considered on a ‘no-fault liability’ basis as envisaged under §163A of the MV Act. In other words, the claimant is not required to prove or plead that death or permanent disablement was due to ‘any wrongful act or neglect or default of the owner of the vehicle.’ Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 deals with the liability without fault.

The claimant involved in a motor vehicle accident is not required to prove wrongful act, neglect, or default on the part of the owner of the vehicle or by any other person. The claim under these provisions is neither defeated or affected in any way, by any wrongful act, neglect or default on the part of the claimant; nor can be of the claimant’s share of responsibility for the accident. In other words, the legal defense of ‘contributory negligence’ is not available to the motorist and his insurer.

These provisions apply in cases where the claimant suffers death or permanent disablement, as defined in the Act. The amounts of compensation are fixed as follows: • Death ` 200000 • Permanent Disablement /Grievious Injury ` 50000 The object behind no-fault principle is to give minimum statutory relief expeditiously to the victim of the road accident or his legal representative. To that extent, these provisions constitute a measure of social justice.

Where no-fault liability is concerned, there is clearly a departure from the usual common law principle that a claimant should establish negligence on the part of the owner or driver of the motor vehicle before claiming any compensation for death or permanent disablement arising out of a motor vehicle accident. The right to claim compensation under section 140 in respect of death of permanent disablement of any person shall be in addition to any other right to claim compensation in respect thereof under any other provision of this Act or of any other law for the time being in force.

Thus the claims for death or permanent disablement can also be pursued under other provisions of the Act on the basis of negligence. The motorist i.e. the owner of the vehicle or driver of the vehicle is liable to pay compensation on the basis of ‘no fault’ as well as on the basis of ‘fault’ or negligence he has to pay first the compensation on ‘no fault’ basis i.e. ` 2000000 or ` 50000 as the case may be, for death or permanent disablement.

The IRD Act has established the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (“IRDA” or “Authority”) as  a statutory regulator to regulate and promote the insurance industry in India and to protect the interests of  holders of insurance policies. The IRDA Act also carried out a series of amendments to the Act of1938 and  conferred the powers of the Controller of Insurance on the IRDA. The members of the IRDA are appointed by  the Central Government from amongest persons of ability, integrity and standing who have knowledge or  experience in life insurance, general insurance, actuarial science, finance, economics, law, accountancy,  administration etc.

The Authority consists of a chairperson, not more than five whole-time members and not  more than four part-time members.  Every Chairperson and member of IRDA appointed shall hold office for a term of five years. However,  the Chairperson shall not hold office once he or she attains 65 years while whole time members shall not hold  office beyond 62 years.  

Central Government may remove any member from office if he or she is adjudged insolvent or is physically  or mentally incapacitated or has been convicted of an offence involving moral turpitude or has acquired  financial or other interests or has abused his position. Chairperson and the whole time members shall not for  a period of two years from the date of cessation of office in IRDA, hold office as an employee with Central  Government or any State Government or with any company in the insurance sector.  

INSURANCE

It’s a contract where one party (Insurer) undertakes in return of an agreed consideration (premium) to pay the other party (Insured) a sum of money or its equivalent in the happening of a specified event which event invariably happens in the future.

The insurance contract is a contract like any other, but with particular peculiar principles. The insurable interest should be beyond the control of either party and there must be an element of negligence or that there is uncertainty. Contracts dealing with uncertain future events are either alieatory, contingent or speculative. In insurance, risk exists in priori, whether or not we insure. However, in a wager/stake/ gamble there is no insurable interest.

It has been observed that the contract of insurance is basically governed by rules which form part of the general law of contract. But equally, there is no doubt that over the years, it has attracted many principles of its own to such an extent that it is perfectly proper to speak of the Law of Insurance. It is a contract based on a promise sometimes it is said to be speculative but it is based on an element of uncertainty as to whether the event insured against will or will not take place.

In Prudential Assurance ltd –vs- Inland Revenue Commissioner (1902) 2 KB 286, it was observed that the event insured against should be one which involves some amount of uncertainty. Firstly, there must either be some uncertainty as to whether the event will ever happen or that if the event ever happens the time at which it happens must be unknown to all the parties. Secondly, the event insured against must be of an advanced character to the insured so that the insured should not on his own volition create that loss or risk and the loss or risk being expressed in pecuniary terms. Thirdly, the event insured against must be of accidental nature.n gambling the risk is created by the contract.

The court in Robertson –v- Hamilton (1911) AC observed that although there are some activities which may prima facie look like insurance transactions they lack in one specific quality in the sense that the risk is of essence to insurance contract and that the insured is moved to effect the contract because of risk of loss and does not, like in these other transactions create the risk of loss by the contract itself. In gambling the contributions are not based on risks involved while in insurance the premiums are based on risks involved. Gamblers are optimists and insurers are pessimists.

NATURE OF INSURANCE CONTRACT

With regard to the parties to the contract, insurance is a bi-party contract and unlike other transactions where we would require the capacity of parties to contract, there is no special requirement as to capacity of the insured before entering into a contract. It has been held that insanity does not incapacitate an insured person. The only requirement needed for the insured before the contract is entered into is that he must have an insurable interest in the subject matter of the insurance before he is.

Held: P’s claim should fail because his aunt had not fully disclosed material facts and the company had considered that even if she had answered to the affirmative they would not have rejected her proposal on account of insanity. The Court held that the contract would have been enforceable had she fully disclosed material facts.

In Darrel –v- International Insurance Company (1880)5 QBD P was drunk when he went to take out a policy. The agent of the insurance company agreed to negotiate terms of policy. He signed it and paid the premiums. 2 years later he fell and got injured on a road. When he claimed under the policy the insurance company declined to pay arguing that by reason of drunkenness he lacked capacity to contract on the date the contract was made.

Held: P’s claim succeeds as drunkenness could not incapacitate him to contract. It is only if by reason of drunkenness P had failed to disclose material facts, would the contract be invalidated, not by reason of drunkenness but non-disclosure. On the part of the offeree (insurer) the legal requirements are that it must be a body corporate. See the control mechanisms above on what insurer must be like to be applicable.