Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to right sidebar Skip to footer
Choose language:

Author: LAW Notes

Custom as a source of law

Custom as a source of law

Custom refers to the code of conduct that has the express approval of the community that observes it. In primitive societies, there were no institutions that acted as authority over the people. This led to people organizing themselves to form cohesive groups in order to maintain fairness, equality, and liberty. They started developing rules with coordinated efforts to make decisions. They eventually started recognising the traditions and rituals practiced by the community routinely and formed a systematized form of social regulation. In India, laws relating to marriage and divorce are mostly developed from customs followed by different religious communities. Additionally, several communities belonging to the Scheduled Tribes category have their own customs related to marriage. As a result of that Section 2(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has exempted Scheduled Tribes from the application of this Act. 

Requisites of a valid custom

  1. Reasonability: The custom must be reasonable or practical and must conform with the basic morality prevailing in the modern-day society. 
  2. Antiquity: It must have been practiced for time immemorial. 
  3. Certainty: The custom must be clear and unambiguous on how it should be practiced.  
  4. Conformity with statutes: No custom must go against the law of the land. 
  5. Continuity in practice: Not only the custom must be practiced for time immemorial, but it should also be practiced without interruption. 
  6. Must not be in opposition to public policy: The custom must adhere to the public policy of the state. 
  7. Must be general or universal: There must be unanimity in the opinion of the community or place in which it is practiced. Hence, it should be universal or general in its application. 

Types of customs 

  1. Customs without a binding obligation 

There are customs that are followed in society that do not have a legal binding force. Such customs are related to clothing, marriage, etc. Not abiding by such customs can only result in a social boycott and not legal consequences. 

  1. Customs with a binding obligation

Customs that are meant to be followed by law are called customs with a binding obligation. They are not related to social conventions or traditions. There are mainly two types of customs with binding obligations- Legal customs and Conventional customs. 

  1. Legal customs: Legal customs are absolute in sanction. They are obligatory in nature and attract legal consequences if not followed. Two types of legal customs are general customs and local customs. General customs are enforced throughout the territory of a state. Local customs on the other hand operate only in particular localities.

      2 ..Conventional customs: Conventional customs are those customs   that are enforceable only on their acceptance through an agreement. Such a custom is only enforceable on the people who are parties to the agreement incorporating it. Two types of conventional customs are general conventional customs and local conventional customs. General Conventional Customs are practiced throughout a territory. Local Conventional Customs on the other hand is restricted to a particular place or to a particular trade or transaction. 

Difference between custom and prescription 

The main difference between the two is that custom gives rise to law and prescription gives rise to a right. Custom is generally observed as a course of conduct and is legally enforceable. Prescription refers to the acquisition of a right or title. When local custom applies to society, the prescription is applicable only to a particular person. For example, when a person Xā€™s forefathers have been grazing their cattle on a particular land for years without restriction, X acquires the same right to graze his cattle on the land. The right acquired by X is called a prescription. For a prescription to be valid, it must be practised from time immemorial. In India, uninterrupted enjoyment for 20 years is essential to acquire a right to light and air as per the Indian Easements Act, 1882.

Legislation as a source of law

Legislation as a source of law

Legislation refers to the rules or laws enacted by the legislative organ of the government. It is one of the most important sources of law in jurisprudence. The word legislation is derived from the words legis and latum, where legis means law and latum means making. 

Types of legislation 

According to Salmond, legislation can be classified into two types- Supreme and Subordinate. 

  1. Supreme legislation 

Legislation is said to be supreme when it is enacted by a supreme or sovereign law-making body. The body must be powerful to the extent that the rules or laws enacted by it cannot be annulled or modified by another body. Indian Parliament cannot be said to be a sovereign law-making body as the laws passed by the parliament can be challenged in the courts. The British Parliament, on the other hand, can be said to be a sovereign law-making body since the validity of laws passed by it cannot be challenged in any court. 

  1. Subordinate legislation 

Legislation enacted by a subordinate law-making body is said to be subordinate legislation. The subordinate body must have derived its law-making authority from a sovereign law-making body. It is subject to the control of the supreme legislative body. The following are the different kinds of subordinate legislation: 

  • Executive legislation: This is a form of subordinate legislation where the executive is granted or conferred certain rule-making powers in order to carry out the intentions of the legislature. 
  • Colonial legislation: Many territories across the globe were colonized by Britain and such territories were called colonies. The legislation passed by the legislature of such colonies was subject to the control of the British Parliament. 
  • Judicial legislation: Courts also have a role in enacting laws that aid in regulating the internal affairs and functioning of courts. 
  • Municipal legislation: Municipal authorities also possess the law-making power as they enact bye-laws. 
  • Autonomous legislation: Another kind of legislation is autonomous legislation, which is concerned with bodies like universities, corporations, clubs, etc. 

Delegated legislation: Sometimes legislative powers may be delegated to certain bodies by the parliament through principal legislation. A principal act may create subsidiary legislation that can make laws as provided in the principal legislation.

precedents and it kindsĀ 

The case law is a common law pillar. This is an important process for achieving common law results. The doctrine of precedent focuses on Ratio decidendi and Obiter Dictum. The purpose of my project is to explain why case law is important in the legal system, what else can be done to create case law, and what other jurisprudence say about case law. How does Stare Decision differ from the precedent, and what are their doctrines.

The types of case are authoritative, persuasive, original, and declarative, and what are their uses and when? Donohue v. Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100, explains the difference between Ratio Decisionendi and Obiter Dictum.

Types of precedentsĀ / Kinds of Precedents

Authoritative and Persuasive

Authoritative precedents are those precedents that must be followed by subordinate courts whether they approve of it or not. They create direct and definite rules of law. They fall into the category of legal sources of law. Persuasive precedents on the other hand do not create a binding obligation on the judges. Persuasive precedents can be applied as per the discretion of the judge. 

Authoritative precedents can be classified into the following two types: 

Absolute authoritative

An absolutely authoritative precedent is binding on subordinate courts in an absolute manner and it cannot be disobeyed even if it is wrong. 

Conditional authoritative

A conditionally authoritative precedent is binding on other judges but it can be disregarded in certain special circumstances as long as the judge shows the reason for doing so. 

Original and Declaratory 

According to Salmond, a declaratory precedent is a precedent that simply declares an already existing law in a judgement. It is a mere application of law. An original precedent creates and applies a new law. 

Factors increasing the authority of a precedent 

  1. The number of judges constituting the bench that makes the decision. 
  2. A unanimous decision has more weight. 
  3. Approval by other courts, especially the higher courts. 
  4. The enactment of a statute that carries the same law subsequently. 

Factors decreasing the authority of a precedent 

  1. Abrogation of judgement by reversal or overrule of a higher court. 
  2. Abrogation of judgement by a statutory rule enacted subsequently. 
  3. Affirmation or reversal of decision on a different ground. 
  4. Inconsistency with the previous decision of a higher court. 
  5. Inconsistency with previous decisions of the court of the same rank. 
  6. Inconsistency with already existing statutory rules. 
  7. Erroneous decision.

The doctrine of Stare DecisisĀ 

The doctrine of Stare Decisis 

The authority of judicial precedents is based on the doctrine of stare decisis. The term stare decisis means to not disturb the undisturbed. In other words, precedents that have been valid for a long time must not be disturbed. 

In India, subordinate courts are bound by the precedents of higher courts, and higher courts are bound by their own precedents. But when it comes to High Courts, the decision of one High Court is not binding on the other High Courts. Their decisions are binding on the subordinate courts. In cases where there are conflicts between decisions of court with the same authority, the latest decision is to be followed. As per Article 141 of the Constitution of India, the Supreme Courtā€™s decisions are binding on all the courts across the country. However, the Supreme Courtā€™s decisions are not binding on itself. In subsequent cases where there are sufficient reasons to deviate from the earlier decision, the Supreme Court can do so. 

Doctrine of Res Judicata 

The term res judicata means subject matter adjudged. As per this doctrine, once a lawsuit has been decided upon, the parties are barred from raising the same issue in courts again, unless new material facts have been discovered. They canā€™t raise another issue arising from the same claim either since they could have raised the same in the previous suit. 

Ratio Decidendi 

As per Salmond, a precedent is a judicial decision that contains a legal principle with an authoritative element called ratio decidendi. Ratio decidendi means reason for the decision. Whenever a judge gets a case to decide on, he has to adjudicate it even when there is no statute or precedent concerning it. The principle that governs such a decision is the reason for the decision which is also called ratio decidendi. 

Obiter Dicta 

The term obiter dictum means mere say by the way. This term is used to refer to statements of law that are not required for the case at hand. A judge may in the judgement of a case declare some legal principles to be applied in a hypothetical situation. It does not have much impact or authority. However, the subordinate courts are bound to apply the principles.

Precedent as a source of law

Precedent as a source of law

Judicial precedents refer to the decisions given by courts in different cases. A judicial decision has a legal principle that is binding on the subordinate courts. Once a court has delivered a judgment on a particular case, the courts subordinate to it must abide by the precedent while deciding on similar cases with similar facts. Some of the most influential judicial precedents in India are the following:Ā 

  1. Kesavananda Bharati v. the State of Kerala (1973): This case is what introduced the concept of the basic structure doctrine in India, protecting the fundamental features of the Indian Constitution from being removed. 
  1. Gian Kaur v. the State of Punjab (1996): This judgement affirmed that the right to die does not come within the scope of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The court affirmed that every person has the right to die with dignity. The court also stated that the right to die in a dignified manner is not the same as the right to die in an unnatural way.
  1.  Maneka Gandhi v. the Union of India (1978): The court held Section 10(3)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967 as void since it violated Article 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution.

Indra Sawhney v. the Union of India (1992): This judgement set a ceiling of 50% for reservation of backward classes. It also held that the criteria of classifying groups as backward classes cannot be limited to economic backwardness.

Kinds of LAW

Kinds of law 

Introduction Law is used in different senses. The use of the term ā€œlawā€ is made in various senses. It denotes different kinds of rules and Principles. Blackstone says ā€œlaw in its most general and comprehensive sense signifies a rule of action and is applied indiscriminately to all kinds of action whether, animate, rational, irrational. Thus we say the law of motion of gravitation of optics or Mechanics, as well as the law of nature and nationsā€ it is helpful in understanding the different senses in which ā€œlawā€ is used in various fields of knowledge. 

Kinds of law by Sir Jhon Salmond Sir John Salmond refers to eight kinds of law

1.Imperative law

2.Physical or scientific law

3. Natural or moral law

4. Conventional law

5. Customary law

6. Practical or technical law

7. International law, and

8. Civil law

Imperative law Imperative law means a rule of action imposed upon by some authority which enforces obedience to it. In other words it is a command enforced by some superior power either physically or in any other form of compulsion

Definitions of law:-

It is very difficult to define the term law. Many Jurists attempted to define the term law. For the Purpose of clarity, some of the definitions given by Jurists in different Periods are categorized as follows. (I) Idealistic Definitions:- Romans and other ancient Jurists defined law in its idealistic nature. Roman Justinianā€™s defined law in the light of its idealistic nature. (a) Salmond: – According to salmond ā€œthe law may be defined as the body of principles recognized and applied by the state in the administration of Justice.

According to Austin, a law, in the strict sense, is a general command of the sovereign individual or the sovereign body. Issued to those in subjectivity and enforced by the physical power of the state. According to Austin ā€œlaw is an aggregate of rules set by men politically superior or sovereign to men as politically subject.ā€ Austin says, ā€œA law is command which obliges a person or persons to a course of conduct.