Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to right sidebar Skip to footer

General principles relating to Fundamental Rights

Fundamental rights are a set of basic human rights that are guaranteed to every citizen of a country to ensure their dignity, freedom, and well-being. In India, fundamental rights are enshrined in Part III (Articles 12 to 35) of the Constitution.

Fundamental rights are the cornerstone of democratic governance in India, ensuring the dignity, liberty, and well-being of individuals. Enshrined in Part III (Articles 12 to 35) of the Indian Constitution, these rights are crucial for the holistic development of individuals and for maintaining the fabric of a democratic society. The judiciary plays a pivotal role in interpreting and protecting these rights. This essay delves into the general principles of fundamental rights, supported by significant case laws and relevant sections.

1. Universality and Equality (Articles 14-18)

The principle of universality implies that fundamental rights are guaranteed to all individuals irrespective of their race, religion, caste, gender, or other distinctions. Equality before the law and equal protection of the laws are the cornerstones of this principle.

  • Article 14: Guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Case Law: State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (1952) – The Supreme Court held that the principle of equality means that equals should be treated equally and unequals should be treated differently if there is a reasonable basis for such classification.
  • Articles 15-18: Prohibit discrimination on various grounds and abolish untouchability and titles. Case Law: Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) – Also known as the Mandal Commission case, this landmark judgment upheld the reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in public sector jobs, emphasizing that affirmative action is permissible under the equality clause.

2. Freedom and Liberty (Articles 19-22)

These articles ensure various freedoms essential for individual liberty and the functioning of a democratic society.

  • Article 19: Guarantees six freedoms, including freedom of speech and expression, assembly, association, movement, residence, and profession. Case Law: Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) – The Supreme Court expanded the interpretation of the right to personal liberty under Article 21, stating that any law affecting personal liberty must pass the test of reasonableness under Article 19.
  • Article 21: Protects life and personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law. Case Law: A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950) – Initially, the Supreme Court adopted a narrow interpretation of Article 21, which was later broadened in the Maneka Gandhi case to include the right to live with human dignity.
  • Article 22: Provides protection against arbitrary arrest and detention. Case Law: Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1994) – The Supreme Court emphasized that an arrest should not be made merely on suspicion, and the police must have a reasonable justification for arresting a person.

3. Protection Against Exploitation (Articles 23-24)

These articles aim to eliminate exploitation in various forms.

  • Article 23: Prohibits human trafficking and forced labor. Case Law: People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India (1982) – The Supreme Court held that non-payment of minimum wages amounts to forced labor and is a violation of Article 23.
  • Article 24: Prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 in hazardous industries. Case Law: M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu (1996) – The Court issued directives to ensure the prohibition of child labor in hazardous industries and emphasized the rehabilitation of affected children.

4. Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)

These articles ensure religious freedom and secularism.

  • Article 25: Guarantees freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion. Case Law: S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) – The Supreme Court affirmed that secularism is a basic feature of the Constitution and that the state must treat all religions equally.
  • Article 26: Provides for the freedom to manage religious affairs. Case Law: The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt (1954) – The Supreme Court recognized the autonomy of religious denominations to manage their own affairs in matters of religion.

5. Cultural and Educational Rights (Articles 29-30)

These articles protect the rights of cultural and educational minorities.

  • Article 29: Protects the interests of minorities by ensuring their right to conserve their culture, language, and script. Case Law: St. Xavier’s College v. State of Gujarat (1974) – The Supreme Court upheld the rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
  • Article 30: Grants minorities the right to establish and administer educational institutions.
  • Case Law: T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002) – The Supreme Court ruled on the extent of government regulation in minority institutions, emphasizing that the autonomy of minority institutions must be respected.

6. Right to Constitutional Remedies (Articles 32-35)

These articles empower individuals to approach the courts to enforce fundamental rights.

  • Article 32: Provides the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights.
  • Case Law: Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1964) – The Supreme Court held that the right to privacy is implicit in the right to life and liberty guaranteed by Article 21, and any violation of this right can be challenged under Article 32.

Conclusion

The fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution are integral to the protection of individual liberty and the maintenance of democratic principles. Through landmark judgments, the judiciary has expanded the scope of these rights, ensuring their dynamic interpretation in line with changing societal needs. These rights, safeguarded by the principle of judicial review, continue to evolve, reinforcing the Constitution’s commitment to justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity,

0 Comments

There are no comments yet

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *