Introduction

The integrity of a democracy relies heavily on free, fair, and transparent elections. Electoral reforms are crucial for ensuring that the election process reflects the will of the people. Political funding, which refers to the financial resources used by political parties and candidates for election campaigns, plays a significant role in shaping electoral outcomes. However, the intersection of money and politics often raises concerns about corruption, influence, and lack of accountability.

This article explores the critical need for electoral reforms and regulatory frameworks for political funding. It delves into the history, evolution, and global case studies of electoral reforms, with a particular focus on India’s trajectory in reforming its electoral processes. Additionally, it examines the significance of political funding, highlighting the types, sources, and transparency mechanisms, along with an in-depth analysis of legal provisions and landmark judicial decisions that have influenced both electoral reforms and political funding.

---

Electoral Reforms: A Global Perspective

Definition of Electoral Reforms

Electoral reforms are legal, political, and administrative changes made to improve the electoral process. These reforms aim to ensure fairness, inclusivity, transparency, and efficiency in the conduct of elections. In most democracies, electoral reforms are introduced to address issues like voter fraud, the influence of money in politics, or the lack of representation of marginalized groups.

Electoral reforms can cover a broad range of issues such as:

• Voter registration processes
• Voting methods and technology
• Campaign finance regulations
• Election dispute resolution mechanisms
• Electoral system design (e.g., proportional representation vs. first-past-the-post)

History and Evolution of Electoral Reforms

Electoral reforms are as old as democratic systems themselves. Over centuries, democratic countries have amended their electoral systems to adapt to social, political, and technological changes. Historically, electoral reforms have been driven by movements seeking more democratic representation, such as the expansion of suffrage rights and the elimination of discriminatory practices.

In ancient Greece and Rome, early forms of voting took place, though they were limited to elite citizens. Modern electoral reforms began in earnest with the spread of representative democracies in the 19th and 20th centuries. For instance, the United Kingdom’s Reform Act of 1832 is considered one of the first major electoral reforms that expanded voting rights and aimed to reduce corruption in parliamentary elections.

By the 20th century, many countries adopted reforms to ensure women’s suffrage, minority representation, and the introduction of anti-corruption mechanisms. The evolution of electoral systems continued with the development of campaign finance regulations, such as the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) in the U.S. in 1971.

Key International Case Studies on Electoral Reforms

1. United States
The U.S. has witnessed significant electoral reforms over the years, especially in the domain of campaign finance and voting rights. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landmark legislation that prohibited racial discrimination in voting. It was a response to the disenfranchisement of African-Americans, particularly in Southern states.

Another key reform in the U.S. electoral landscape came through the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (2002), also known as the McCain-Feingold Act, which aimed to eliminate “soft money” (unregulated contributions to political parties). However, recent rulings, such as the Citizens United v. FEC (2010) decision, have complicated the campaign finance reform landscape by allowing corporations to spend unlimited amounts in support of political campaigns under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.

2. United Kingdom
The U.K. has a long history of electoral reforms, most notably the Representation of the People Act, 1918, which granted voting rights to women over the age of 30. Later, the Representation of the People Act, 1969 lowered the voting age to 18, aligning the system with broader social changes.

In 2000, the Political Parties, Elections, and Referendums Act (PPERA) introduced comprehensive reforms, including limits on campaign spending and the establishment of the Electoral Commission to oversee political funding.

3. Germany
Germany operates a mixed-member proportional representation system, a form of electoral reform designed to blend the benefits of both majoritarian and proportional representation. The system was introduced after World War II to prevent the rise of extremist parties, ensuring that the political landscape remains balanced. One of the most recent reforms in Germany includes efforts to increase transparency in political donations.

---

Electoral Reforms in India

Historical Context

Electoral reforms in India have evolved since its independence in 1947. The Indian Constitution, through Articles 324 to 329, lays the foundation for free and fair elections, empowering the Election Commission of India (ECI) to oversee and regulate the process. Over the years, various reforms have been introduced to strengthen India’s democratic process, including efforts to tackle corruption, increase voter participation, and ensure fairness in the electoral process.

Key Milestones in India’s Electoral Reforms

1. Lowering of Voting Age (1989): The 61st Constitutional Amendment lowered the voting age from 21 to 18, significantly expanding the voter base and enhancing youth participation in politics.
2. Introduction of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs): To reduce fraud and streamline voting, EVMs were introduced in 1982 and later adopted nationwide in 2004.
3. NOTA (None of the Above): Introduced in 2013, NOTA allows voters to reject all candidates in a constituency, thereby acting as a protest vote against poor-quality candidates.
4. Anti-Defection Law (1985): Enacted as the 10th Schedule of the Constitution, this law prevents elected legislators from switching parties after elections, thus curbing the problem of horse-trading.

Constitutional Framework for Electoral Reforms

The constitutional framework for electoral reforms in India is centered on the provisions laid down in Part XV of the Constitution (Articles 324-329). These articles establish the independence of the Election Commission and regulate matters such as delimitation of constituencies, preparation of electoral rolls, and the conduct of elections.

Important Electoral Reform Laws

1. Representation of the People Act, 1951: This Act provides the legal foundation for elections in India. It covers every aspect of the electoral process, including the qualification of candidates, the election process, disputes, and more. The Act has been amended multiple times to address evolving challenges in Indian elections.
2. Anti-Defection Law (10th Schedule): This law aims to bring stability to governments by preventing elected members from switching parties mid-term, which could destabilize governments and undermine the electorate’s mandate.
3. NOTA: The introduction of the “None of the Above” option in 2013 aimed at giving voters the right to reject all candidates in a constituency. Though NOTA does not impact the election results, it is considered an important tool for protest voting and encouraging better candidate selection.

Case Laws on Electoral Reforms in India

1. Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms (2002):
   In this landmark case, the Supreme Court ruled that voters have the right to know the criminal, financial, and educational backgrounds of candidates. The ruling led to significant reforms in transparency and disclosure during elections.
2. Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2013):
   The Supreme Court held that elected representatives convicted of a crime cannot continue in office, and their disqualification will take effect immediately upon conviction. This judgment was significant in the battle against criminalization in politics.

---

Political Funding: Definitions and Sources

Meaning and Scope of Political Funding

Political funding refers to the financial resources used by political parties and candidates to campaign during elections. These funds cover campaign-related expenses, such as advertising, voter outreach, and organizing rallies. Political funding can come from various sources, including private donors, public financing, and corporate contributions.

Types of Political Funding: Public vs. Private

Political funding can be categorized into public and private financing:

• Public Funding: In some democracies, the government provides financial support to political parties to reduce their dependence on private donors, who might expect political favors in return.
• Private Funding: Private individuals, corporations, and interest groups contribute to political parties and candidates. The challenge with private funding is the risk of undue influence over political decision-making.

Sources of Political Funding

1. Corporate Donations: Corporations contribute to political campaigns either directly or through Political Action Committees (PACs). In India, corporate funding was allowed under the Companies Act, 2013.
2. Individual Contributions: Citizens contribute to political campaigns, often in exchange for policy promises or ideological alignment with a party or candidate.
3. Electoral Bonds: Introduced in 2018, electoral bonds allow individuals and companies to donate anonymously to political parties.

Transparency in Political Funding

One of the key concerns with political funding is transparency. In India, despite legal frameworks, there are loopholes that allow for anonymous donations, especially through electoral bonds, which critics argue facilitate the influx of unaccounted money into the political system.

---

Political Funding in India: Legal Framework and Reforms

Overview of Existing Laws on Political Funding

1. The Companies Act, 2013: This law governs corporate donations to political parties. Under the Act, companies are permitted to contribute up to 7.5% of their average net profits over the last three years to political parties.
2. Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA): The FCRA regulates foreign donations to political parties. The law prohibits political parties from accepting donations from foreign entities to avoid external influence in domestic politics.
3. Representation of the People Act, 1951: This Act outlines the legal framework for political funding and sets limits on candidates’ election expenses.

Introduction of Electoral Bonds

In 2018, the government introduced the Electoral Bonds Scheme, allowing individuals and companies to donate to political parties without disclosing their identity. The bonds can be purchased from authorized banks and deposited into political parties’ bank accounts.

Electoral Bonds Scheme, 2018

The scheme was introduced to increase transparency in political donations while protecting the privacy of donors. However, it has been criticized for promoting opacity in political funding, as the identities of donors remain undisclosed to the public.

Controversies Surrounding Electoral Bonds

Critics argue that the scheme enables anonymous donations, thus allowing for the circulation of black money in elections. The Supreme Court of India has been hearing petitions regarding the constitutionality of the electoral bond scheme, with the main contention being the lack of transparency.

Case Laws and Judicial Interventions

1. Common Cause v. Union of India (2018): This case questioned the legality of the electoral bond scheme, arguing that it promotes the inflow of black money into elections. The Supreme Court directed interim transparency measures but did not strike down the scheme.
2. Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (2020): This case sought a stay on the sale of electoral bonds, claiming that the scheme violated the right to information. The Supreme Court is yet to provide a final verdict on the issue.

---

Conclusion

Both electoral reforms and political funding are interconnected in shaping a truly democratic system where elections reflect the will of the people, devoid of corruption or coercion. Ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness in the election process is not just a legal necessity but a moral imperative for upholding the democratic values that India holds dear. Future reforms, bolstered by public debate, judicial intervention, and active civil society participation, will be key to securing the integrity of elections and safeguarding the future of Indian democracy.